| 1. |
- Astermark, Jan, et al.
(author)
-
Antibodies to factor VIIa in patients with haemophilia and high-responding inhibitors.
- 2002
-
In: British Journal of Haematology. - : Wiley. - 0007-1048. ; 119:2, s. 342-347
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The haemostatic effect of by-passing agents such as activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) and recombinant factor VIIa is inadequate in some patients with severe haemophilia and high-responding inhibitors. Theoretically, this could be due to antibody reactivity to procoagulant proteins other than the deficient factor. To evaluate this hypothesis, immunoglobulin (Ig) fractions from six multi-transfused patients (three haemophilia A and three haemophilia B) were purified on protein A sepharose and then subjected to immunoaffinity chromatography on factor IX sepharose and factor VIIa sepharose. All three Ig fractions from the haemophilia B patients, but not commercially available Ig, contained antibodies that bound to both gels. None of the haemophilia A patients had antibodies to factor IX but all three had antibodies towards factor VIIa. The immunoaffinity purified antifactor IX and VIIa antibodies from the haemophilia B patients inhibited thrombin formation in vitro using Feiba(R) as active enzyme, but had no significant effect in the presence of NovoSeven(R). In contrast, no inhibitory effect was observed with the antifactor VIIa antibodies from the haemophilia A patients. Cross-reactivity to factor IX was seen for the antifactor VIIa antibodies from the patients with haemophilia B. Our findings show that antibody reactivity to other procoagulant factors such as factor VIIa exists in patients with high-responding inhibitors and that these antibodies may have an inhibitory potential that correlates to the amount of active enzyme present. The characterization of the antibody profile may facilitate an optimal treatment with by-passing agents in severe bleeding events.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Astermark, Jan, et al.
(author)
-
The Malmo International Brother Study (MIBS): further support for genetic predisposition to inhibitor development in hemophilia patients
- 2001
-
In: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216. ; 7:3, s. 267-272
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The issue of factors predisposing for inhibitor development in haemophilia patients is still largely unresolved. In an attempt to address this problem, we initiated a registry in 1996 of siblings with haemophilia and with or without a history of inhibitors. Four hundred and sixty families have accrued, of whom 388 suffer from haemophilia A and 72 haemophilia B. Twenty-five of the brother pairs are twins. The inhibitor incidence in all families with severe haemophilia A was 31.7%. The corresponding figure in the caucasian patients was 27.4%, whereas a higher incidence of inhibitors was reported in the black subjects (55.6%). Twins were reported in six of the 100 inhibitor families, for whom monozygocity was confirmed in three cases. In 32 families (32%), at least two brothers had a history of inhibitors. In 22 (69%) of these families, the inhibitor was also of the same type, i.e. either high- or low-responding. The overall concordance within the severe haemophilia A families was found to be 78.3% (195/249) compared to an expected figure of 68.0% and 58.0% using an inhibitor incidence of 20 and 30%, respectively (P < 0.0001). The corresponding figure for the twins was 88.2% (15/17). Moreover, the risk for inhibitor development in families with a previous inhibitor history was found to be 48% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35-62%), whereas the risk in families with no previous known inhibitor was only 15% (95% CI 11-21%) corresponding to a relative risk of 3.2 (95% CI 2.1-4.9). Immune-tolerance induction was reported in 24 families, of whom 13 siblings were successfully treated. Our data clearly support the concept that a genetic predisposition for inhibitor development exists. However, the markers of this predisposition remain to be elucidated and we believe that the MIBS registry will be useful for this purpose.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Berntorp, Erik, et al.
(author)
-
Consensus perspectives on prophylactic therapy for haemophilia: summary statement.
- 2003
-
In: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216. ; 9:Suppl 1, s. 41278-41278
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Participants in an international conference on prophylactic therapy for severe haemophilia developed a consensus summary of the findings and conclusions of the conference. In the consensus, participants agreed upon revised definitions for primary and secondary prophylaxis and also made recommendations concerning the need for an international system of pharmacovigilance. Considerations on starting prophylaxis, monitoring outcomes, and individualizing treatment regimens were discussed. Several research questions were identified as needing further investigation, including when to start and when to stop prophylaxis, optimal dosing and dose interval, and methods for assessment of long-term treatment effects. Such studies should include carefully defined cohorts, validated orthopaedic and quality-of-life assessment instruments, and cost-benefit analyses.
|
|
| 6. |
- Berntorp, Erik, et al.
(author)
-
Immune tolerance induction and the treatment of hemophilia. Malmo protocol update
- 2000
-
In: Haematologica. - 1592-8721. ; 85:10 Suppl, s. 48-48
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The Malmo protocol for immune tolerance induction includes high doses of Factor VIII/IX, intravenous IgG and cyclophosphamide. If the inhibitor titer exceeds 10 Bethesda units at start, extracorporeal adsorption of IgG is performed using protein A. The protocol sometimes has to be repeated. A successful response may occur within a few weeks. In hemophilia A the success rate so far is 10/17 patients (15 high-responders, 2 low-responders) or 59%, whereas in hemophilia B 6/9 patients (8 high-responders, 1 low-responder), or 67%, have become tolerant. In one hemophilia B patient, a relapse occurred after 6 months. During a second treatment episode he developed an acute myocardial infarction, probably caused by replacement with prothrombin complex concentrate. We conclude that the Malmo protocol is efficient for induction of immune tolerance but the patients must be selected particularly with regard to inhibitor duration and time of last booster.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Carlborg, E, et al.
(author)
-
The Malmo model for immune tolerance induction: impact of previous treatment on outcome
- 2000
-
In: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216. ; 6:6, s. 639-639
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Ten patients, who had been treated according to the Malmo model for immune tolerance induction (ITI), were analysed regarding treatment with clotting factors and chemotherapy during the time period between inhibitor detection and ITI. Of the patients who were successfully rendered tolerant (n=6) all but one had received treatment with FVIII, either alone (n=1), or combined with cyclophosphamide (n=4). Of the patients who did not become tolerant, three of four had received treatment with FVIII during the inhibitor period but only one with FVIII and chemotherapy. The total amount of treatment received was in general much lower in the group that did not become tolerant. In individual cases, it appeared very clear that the inhibitor level and anamnestic response was substantially reduced prior to the ITI using the Malmo treatment model. We conclude that treatment of acute bleeds during the inhibitor period may be of importance for ITI and that the different response rates published for different immune tolerance regimens most likely do not reflect the true response rate for the respective regimen.
|
|
| 9. |
- Fischer, K, et al.
(author)
-
Prophylactic treatment for severe haemophilia: comparison of an intermediate-dose to a high-dose regimen
- 2002
-
In: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216. ; 8:6, s. 753-760
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- A multicentre study was performed in Sweden and the Netherlands, comparing effects of two prophylactic regimens in 128 patients with severe haemophilia, born 1970-90. 42 Swedish patients (high-dose prophylaxis), were compared with 86 Dutch patients (intermediate-dose prophylaxis). Patients were evaluated at the date of their last radiological score according to Pettersson. Annual clotting factor consumption and bleeding frequency were registered for a period of three years before evaluation. Patients in the high-dose group were younger at evaluation (median 15.2 vs. 17.9 years), started prophylaxis earlier (median 2 vs. 5 years), and used 2.19 times more clotting factor kg(-1) year(-1). Patients treated with high-dose prophylaxis had fewer joint bleeds (median 0.3 year(-1) vs. 3.3 year(-1)) and the proportion of patients without arthropathy as measured by the Pettersson score was higher (69% vs. 32%), however, the age-adjusted difference in scores (median 0 points vs. 4 points) was small and at present not statistically significant. Clinical scores and quality of life were similar. These findings suggest that, compared with intermediate-dose prophylaxis, high-dose prophylaxis significantly increases treatment costs and reduces joint bleeds over a period of 3 years, but only slightly reduces arthropathy after 17 years of follow-up.
|
|
